Legislature(2007 - 2008)BELTZ 211
05/04/2007 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB19 | |
SB145 | |
SB18 | |
SB157 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
= | HB 19 | ||
= | SB 145 | ||
= | SB 18 | ||
= | SB 157 | ||
CSHB 19(FIN)-LTD. DRIVER'S LICENSES/IGNITION INTERLOCK CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of HB 19 and asked for a motion to adopt Version \R. 1:40:23 PM SENATOR THERRIAULT motioned to adopt Senate committee substitute (CS) for CSHB 19, Version \R, labeled 25-LS0133\R, as the working document before the committee. There being no objection, it was so ordered. MIKE PAWLOWSKI, Aide to Representative Kevin Meyer, advised that the sponsor wants him to convey that merging the two proposals creates a more comprehensive program. The pieces of the bill that are intact from the original version are found in Sections 1 and 3. Section 1 is clean up language related to ignition interlock devices in the tampering statutes Section 3 is conforming language. CHAIR FRENCH explained that Version\ R combines Representative Meyer's limited license interlock bill and the interlock bill he had been working on. The limited license interlock is available on a first, second or third DWI as long as the terms of the limited license haven't been violated. Section 4 says if you've violated the terms of the limited license then it's no longer an option. The remaining sections deal with ignition interlocks during the period of probation for having been convicted of DWI. Currently there is a year of interlock for a first conviction, two years for a second conviction, three years on a third conviction, and throughout the period of probation after that. Also there is a uniform standard for where and when ignition interlocks are used. Basically that tracks the person's insurance requirements, he stated. 1:43:10 PM MR. PAWLOWSKI relayed that the sponsor believes that the Chair's interpretation of how to deal with smaller communities and the insurance exemption leads to a more predictable outcome as opposed to leaving it to the courts. CHAIR FRENCH stated that it was a pleasure to work with him and Representative Meyer. He described this as a bold new experiment in DWI prosecution because it will require ignition interlocks for every person who is convicted of DWI. He thanked Senator Wielechowski for his work on that idea. "It seems to be working in New Mexico and Alaska has had a long and tragic history…with DWI, and there doesn't seem to be any downside to giving this a go," he stated. MR. PAWLOWSKI added that the probation lengths that the Chair put in correspond well with the Department of Public Safety's letter that talks about the amazing gains in recidivism in Canadian provinces that have a similar provision. He noted it's in the neighborhood of 80 plus percent. CHAIR FRENCH said we're all hopeful. 1:44:28 PM SENATOR THERRIAULT asked him to clarify whether it's a recidivism rate of 80 percent or 80 percent of the people. MR. PAWLOWSKI clarified that it's a decrease in recidivism in 80 percent of the people. SENATOR THERRIAULT asked about the fiscal impact. MR. PAWLOWSKI said HB 19 had a fiscal note from the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) relating to producing a new license. In the first year the impact is $76 thousand with personal services comprising the largest component. Contractual services represents programming for the DMV data base that would be done in only the first year. Each subsequent year the cost is $59 thousand, which is paid for by the application fees. CHAIR FRENCH moved 25-LS0133\R.1 as Amendment 1 and objected for discussion purposes. 25-LS0133\R.1 Luckhaupt 7/11/09 AMENDMENT 1 Page 3, line 6, following "and": Insert ", when applicable," CHAIR FRENCH explained that this clarifies that this section applies to driving on the road system, which he's using as a proxy for where you have mandatory insurance and where you have to have the interlocks. "If you don't have to have the interlock, you don't have to comply with this section." SENATOR THERRIAULT asked if he could get around the requirement by moving to a community that doesn't require an interlock. CHAIR FRENCH said no. MR. PAWLOWSKI added that the key is on page 3, line 4 where it says that it would be a requirement "whenever the person operates a motor vehicle." CHAIR FRENCH explained that he could avoid the requirement to use an interlock if he moved to a small community and stayed there to operate his motor vehicle where there is no requirement to have insurance. He could not avoid the requirement by claiming to be from that community because he got a post office box and registered his vehicle there. MR. PAWLOWSKI described the addition as clean-up language. 1:48:09 PM CHAIR FRENCH removed his objection to Amendment 1. Finding no further objection he announced that Amendment 1 is adopted and the bill is back before the committee. He noted that the effective date is January 1, 2008. Finding no further discussion, he asked for a motion. 1:48:54 PM SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI motioned to report SCS CSHB 19(JUD) from committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal note(s). There being no objection, it was so ordered. 1:49:20 PM at ease.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|